Drapeau, M. (2006). Non-coincidental pleiotropy of pigmentation, brain, and behavior and its evolution. PHILICA.COM Observation number 18.
Non-coincidental pleiotropy of pigmentation, brain, and behavior and its evolution

Mark D. Drapeauconfirmed userThis person has donated to Philica (Department of Biology, New York University)

Published in neuro.philica.com

Since the beginning of modern genetics a century ago, mutants causing changes in cuticle, fur, or skin pigmentation have been associated with alterations in animal behavior. The connection has commonly been considered coincidence. However, the more recent discoveries of neural pigmentation gene expression (e.g. Drapeau et al. 2003) suggest that these genes have genuine functions in the brain. This classical genetic pattern – a non-coincidental pleiotropy of pigmentation, brain, and behavior – is common. Why?

I hypothesize that the evolution of a pigmentation gene product to a neural function may have occurred as follows. First, assuming that primitive organismal pigmentation predated the evolution of a complex central nervous system (CNS), the pleiotropic genes under consideration most likely first had a pigmentation function. Second, during CNS evolution along more complex lineages, some external pigmented cells were utilized internally. (Pigmented nerves containing melanin may be a consequence of this.) Three, after pigmentation genes were functioning (unnecessarily) in the CNS, their protein products were relatively unconstrained and free to evolve new functions while retaining an ancient pigmentation function. These novel brain functions are observed today as being required for normal adult animal behavior.

Pigmentation genes may have a tendency to be required for sex-limited behaviors. Because animal coloration is very often sex-specific (e.g. ducks, butterflies, peacocks), pigmentation genes are under sex-specific control at a transcriptional level. (There is some empirical evidence for this in model organisms.) Hence, since these particular genes would not have to evolve sex-specific regulation in the brain ‘de novo’, we may expect them to play sex-specific roles in the brain and behavior. One example is the requirement of the ‘yellow’ gene for the male courtship ritual of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster (e.g. Drapeau et al. 2003, 2006).

Observation circumstances
This observation stems from my Ph.D. dissertation research on a gene required for both pigmentation and behavior in fruit flies, early informal talks with B. Fuller at UC-Irvine, and many discussions with additional scientists who have done extensive work on genes required for pigmentation, behavior, or both.

Drapeau, M. D., Radovic, A., Wittkopp, P. J., & Long, A. D. (2003). A gene necessary for normal male courtship, yellow, acts downstream of fruitless in the Drosophila melanogaster larval brain. Journal of Neurobiology, 55, 53-72.

Drapeau, M. D., Cyran, S. A., Viering, M. M., Geyer, P. K., & Long, A. D. (2006). A cis-regulatory sequence within the yellow locus of Drosophila melanogaster required for normal male mating success. Genetics, 172, 1009-1030.

Information about this Observation
This Observation has not yet been peer-reviewed

Published on Wednesday 26th July, 2006 at 14:32:26.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.
The full citation for this Observation is:
Drapeau, M. (2006). Non-coincidental pleiotropy of pigmentation, brain, and behavior and its evolution. PHILICA.COM Observation number 18.

Website copyright © 2006-07 Philica; authors retain the rights to their work under this Creative Commons License and reviews are copyleft under the GNU free documentation license.
Using this site indicates acceptance of our Terms and Conditions.

This page was generated in 0.0087 seconds.