Equations are not being displayed properly on some articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Our apologies.

Smyrk, J. (2006). Project threats and opportunities--a conjecture. PHILICA.COM Observation number 29.

ISSN 1751-3030  
Log in  
  1341 Articles and Observations available | Content last updated 23 February, 05:23  
Philica entries accessed 3 654 240 times  

NEWS: The SOAP Project, in collaboration with CERN, are conducting a survey on open-access publishing. Please take a moment to give them your views

Submit an Article or Observation

We aim to suit all browsers, but recommend Firefox particularly:

Project threats and opportunities—a conjecture

John Smyrkconfirmed userThis person has donated to Philica (School of Management, Marketing & International Business, Australian National University)

Published in mani.philica.com

Why threats tend to arise more frequently than opportunities in project risk registers: a conjecture

In practice, project Risk Registers are dominated by events that could damage a project. Such events are called threats. Opportunities (events that could enhance a project’s performance) appear rarely. Many people find this situation puzzling because superficial examination of the risk model suggests that beneficial effects should occur as often as those that are damaging. I propose that the reason lies in the nature of the business objectives established for projects.
There are two broad approaches to objective setting:
• Treat the project as an optimising (that is, a maximising or minimising), problem—such as “minimise procurement costs”. A target outcome expressed in this way cannot be tested for success.
• Treat the project as a satisficing problem (after Herbert Simon http://www.economyprofessor.com/theorists/herbertsimon.php) where target outcomes are set in terms of thresholds—such as “reduce procurement costs by 25%”. Success is readily decided here—by asking whether or not the threshold was reached.
Accepted practice in the formulation of business cases generally follows the second of these two approaches—based on satisfying each of five criteria (one objective and four constraints). A project will be unambiguously successful if:
• The objective (expressed as measurable target outcomes) is realised.
• All outputs are delivered fit for purpose.
• The project budget is not exceeded,
• Timeframes are met.
• No unexpected disbenefits are generated.
Each parameter involves a clear focus on a threshold, and so we become preoccupied with events that could cause underperformance (threats) rather than events that result in overperformance (opportunities).

Observation circumstances
As a professional consultant and academic working in the field of project management I, like many others, am intrigued that real-life risk registers rarely contain “positive” chance events (opportunities). Why should “negative” factors (threats) preoccupy the key stakeholders in a project?

Information about this Observation
This Observation has not yet been peer-reviewed
This Observation was published on 18th November, 2006 at 08:33:44 and has been viewed 10865 times.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.
The full citation for this Observation is:
Smyrk, J. (2006). Project threats and opportunities—a conjecture. PHILICA.COM Observation number 29.

<< Go back Review this ObservationPrinter-friendlyReport this Observation

Website copyright © 2006-07 Philica; authors retain the rights to their work under this Creative Commons License and reviews are copyleft under the GNU free documentation license.
Using this site indicates acceptance of our Terms and Conditions.

This page was generated in 0.3726 seconds.