Equations are not being displayed properly on some articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Our apologies.

Hu, W. (2011). Earthquake is abrupt release of radiation from crust fissure or hole. PHILICA.COM Article number 278.

ISSN 1751-3030  
Log in  
Register  
  1163 Articles and Observations available | Content last updated 20 August, 01:50  
Philica entries accessed 3 230 644 times  


NEWS: The SOAP Project, in collaboration with CERN, are conducting a survey on open-access publishing. Please take a moment to give them your views

Submit an Article or Observation

We aim to suit all browsers, but recommend Firefox particularly:

Earthquake is abrupt release of radiation from crust fissure or hole

Wan-Jiung Huunconfirmed user (Academia Sinica, Taiwan, Hong Kong University)

Published in geo.philica.com

Abstract
Earthquake is traditionally thought to be cause by plate tectonics movement. Plate tectonics movement is thought to be mediated by continental drift and expansion of ocean crust. Evidence showed that mid-Atlantic ridge is the source of expansion of ocean crust. Plate tectonics theory can explain why most earthquakes happen in mid-Atlantic area, Pacific ring of fire, and Mediterranean Alpide belt. However, earthquake theory due to plate tectonics has several defects. The continental drift is a very slow and constant process. It cannot account for the abrupt happening of most earthquakes. In addition, plate tectonics cannot explain many intraplate earthquakes and the huge severity of intraplate earthquakes such as current Sichuan earthquake. Plate tectonics theory cannot explain many earthquake related phenomenon such as earthquake light, radio disturbance, infrared anomaly, and strange animal behaviors. Here, we propose a new alternate theory for earthquake occurring. Earthquake is actually a sudden radiation pressure (Lightity) release from earth crust fissures and holes. The huge amount of energy release causes the movement of earth crust and induces seismic wave spread. Current plate tectonics theory cannot successfully predict earthquake happening. We think the alternate theory can help earthquake prediction in the future to avoid detrimental human life loss.

Article body

 

About the author

 

Wan-Jiung Hu is a MD from National Taiwan University and a PhD from Johns Hopkins University. Despite of his medical background, he finished all required courses in college physics and college chemistry. Now, he is working as a postdoc fellow in Academia Sinica of Taiwan. Because there is no Taiwan for choice in Philica, I select Hong Kong China instead. In the beginning of this year, he published physic research results in the book "Theories of everything by logic" which is available in Amazon and Barnes & Noble bookstores. This book received 5 star recommendation from James Powell, professor in department of physics of University of Texas in San Antonio. 

Maintext 

Professor Alfred Wegener proposed continental drift theory in 1912. He suggested that all the continents were joined together in old times and they separated by some unknown forces. In the beginning, his idea was thought to be absurd and was difficult to be accepted by people. However, further researches on ocean crust revealed that the ocean crust is actually expanding. This phenomenon happens in the mid-Atlantic ridge. Ocean crust is generated from the mid-Atlantic ridge and spread to both east and west side. We can find the symmetrical alternative geomagnetism reversal pattern in the two sides from mid-Atlantic ridge. The continental coasts of west Africa and east South America can match perfectly. In addition, fossils of the same species can be found in both South America and Africa. Thus, it suggested that South America and Africa was joined together in old era. Thus, continental drift theory was accepted, and then plate tectonics theory was developed to explain the happening of earthquakes and volcano eruptions. Plate tectonics theory says that earth crust can be divided into several "plates", and these "plates" crush each other to induce earthquakes. The plate crush movement is caused by ocean crust expansion and continental drift. Currently, it is a well-accepted theory for earthquake happening.

 

However, plate tectonics theory has several fetal defects. First of all, the sudden happening of earthquake in certain point should not be due to the slow process of continental drift. The continental drift is at a speed around 1cm per year. Thus, it only accumulates 30cm per 30 years. It is a very slow process and it cannot account for the huge energy release during a major earthquake. How can a 30cm plate movement per 30 year cause an energy release which is greater than 100x atom bomb energy? The slow continental drift cannot explain the sudden movement of rocks of plates during a major earthquake. In addition, plate tectonics movement or continental drift is a large scale movement and it cannot be accounted for earthquake happening in a single point. According to Young's modulus formula, the pressure is P=F/A=E*(DL/L). Since the palate tectonic is wide ranged (huge L), the pressure caused by plate should be very small. Thus, plate tectonics theory cannot well explain the great force of earthquake.

 

Second, the continental drift is only proved between South America and Africa. The continental coast of South America and Africa matches only mean that there is ocean expansion in the Atlantic Ocean. In addition, the fossils which are similar in South America and Africa mean that only South America and Africa were joined together. For other major continents, the evidences for all continents were joined together are weak. Thus, we cannot say all the continents are moving. We cannot say all the continents are moving which causes earthquake. Where the evidence is, where the conclusion is.

 

Third, plate tectonics theory cannot explain intrapalate earthquakes. There are some "hotspots" which have frequent earthquake. For example, Hawaii suffers from a lot of earthquakes per year. However, Hawaii is not located in the boundary of plates. In addition, there are several detrimental intraplate earthquakes. For example, the Sichuan earthquake currently is a huge intraplate earthquake. Plate tectonics theory cannot explain this. How can an earthquake happen when the location is not in the boundary of plates? Based on the plate tectonics theory, the intraplate earthquakes should be small or trivial. How can it cause such a huge and detrimental earthquake such as Sichuan earthquake?

 

Here, we propose a new mechanism for earthquake. Earthquake is actually a radiation release from the inside earth. Radiation energy acting on faults causes earthquake. Radiation energy is important in our earth. The earth core and mantle has an estimated temperature around 4000 to 5000 absolute temperature. Radiation needs to be released from inside earth to outside space because it needs to diffuse out to outer space to gain maximal entropy. We can view these heat particles are photons with momentum, and they will collide each other to expel each other to diffuse out. The formula for Stefan-Boltzmann's law is:

 

Power=σAT4 (A=4πR2)

 

The unit of radiation power is joule per second. Earth is covered by crusts to prevent radiation release. It means that radiation will reflex if it touches the inside crust. Thus, it means that in every second, radiation energy is accumulating when radiation is not released to outside space. After 30 years, we can see huge amount of radiation energy achieves. Because the earth core and mantle have very high temperature, we can see that the accumulated radiation energy can cause very detrimental effect. Normally, the radiation energy of inside earth is under the suppression of outer earth crust. After accumulation for decades, the accumulated radiation becomes greater and greater and it finally needs to be released.

 

We hypothesize that the radiation is released from earth inner core with its 5700 absolute degree and its 1200 Km in diameter. It can travel through the viscous-liquid mantle:

 

Thus, power=1.1*1021 watt

Even in one second, the total energy is huge.

Energy=1.1*1021 joule

 

We know the energy of a typical atomic bomb is 1014 joule.

 

Thus, the energy released from inner core is 107 larger than an atomic bomb.

We assume the heat energy can be transformed into work:

W=F*S (if S=1km=1000meter up-moved crust by the released inner energy)

 

The total force=1018 Newton->very great force

 

It is also possible that the radiation is released from mantle with average temperature 1000K. We assume the radiation is from a 1meter*1meter area in mantle. When it is emitted and touched the inner side of crust, it will go back and accumulate. However, when it reflected back, it may change its direction a little bit. After 30 years, the group of reflected radiation beam can have a lot of energy. If it finds a direction (with a refraction angle) which can emit out from the crust fissure and hole. Then, the radiation can be released out and cause earthquake.

 

Power=7.16*105 Watt(1000K and 1meter*1meter mantle area)

After 30 years, the total energy:

Energy=7*1014 joule which is equal to 7 atomic bombs

If the crust is up-moved by 1000 meter, there will be:

W=F*S

Force=7*1011 Newton, still very large

 

Frequently, the radiation is released from crust fissures and holes. Earth crust fissures include mid-Atlantic ridge and peri-Pacific troughs. Crust holes are the hot spots such as Hawaii. Molten lava from mantle also can be released from these fissures and holes. That is why "Pacific ring of fire" (peri-Pacific troughs) is both for volcano eruptions and earthquakes. That is why the Hawaii "Hotspot" is both for volcano eruptions and earthquakes. Radiation theory can explain why volcano happens in the same places as earthquake happens. When the radiation is released from inside earth and is passing through the earth crust, radiation energy can cause physical movement of faults of crust. When radiation pushes the crust to move upward, then the crust can move downward to return due to gravity. However, another radiation flush pushes the crust to move upward again. The back and forth phenomenon causes the shock wave. Then, earthquake happens and seismic wave occurs. If there is a fault A\B, the radiation releasing between A layer and B layer can push B layer upward or push A layer upward or downward. That explains why some P wave is upward and the other is downward. Touching A layer or B layer is depending on the angle of radiation beam.

 

The new theory can explain intraplate earthquakes. If there is fault in the earth crust, there is possibility that radiation pressure can be released via these faults. They are naturally gaps which allow radiation pressure to pass through. Thus, it can explain why some intraplate earthquakes are also very huge and detrimental. For examples, Sichuan or Tangshan earthquakes are both huge and detrimental intraplate earthquakes. Plate tectonic theory cannot well explain this.

 

We can see similar effect on our sun. When solar wind or solar flare is released from the sun surface, it also causes huge amount of seismic wave release.1 It is called "sunshock" or "sunquake". We think the basic mechanism of sunquake and earthquake is the same: both are due to the release of radiation from inside to outside. Because the sun has much greater absolute temperature, the sunquake caused by sun flare is even much greater than major earthquakes.

 

In this new theory, we can also explain many earthquake phenomenon which cannot be explained by traditional plate tectonics theory. Earthquake light before or during earthquake is an important phenomenon related to earthquake happening.2-5 For example, many people observed white to blue light shining in the sky for all night during the Peru earthquake. Plate tectonics theory says that it is caused by suddenly transformation of rocks into a semi-conductor (p-hole) like substance. Thus, rocks can emit light. This mechanism explained by plate tectonics theory is very strange and cannot be accepted. Rocks are electrically neutral and are simply mass not charge. Even the rock mass is accelerated, it cannot emit electromagnetic radiation based on fundamental Maxwell's classical electromagnetism. Why can an earthquake transform rocks into semi-conductors? In addition, radio disturbance and ionosphere anomaly are usually observed during or before earthquake happening6-11. Electromagnetism field anomaly or infrared light anomaly is also observed by satellite or other instruments during a major earthquake12-21. Some researchers also noted some changes of animal behaviors. If the earthquake is the release of radiation pressure, we can easily explain visible earthquake light, radio disturbance, EMW/ionosphere anomaly, and infrared light anomaly. Animal behavior change may be due to that some animals can detect the change of radiation wave.22 

 

In majority of earthquake observations, infrared light and radio frequency disturbance are frequently seen before earthquake. However, UV abnormal signals are seldom seen. We will deduct the reason here. When a radiation beam is emitted from earth mantle or inner core to outside space, it must suffer from a phenomenon called refraction. It is like light is emitted from water to air. Because the radiation energy is accumulated, it is not going straight from the mantle just below the crust fissure or hole. There is a refraction angle. The refraction index is:

 

Snell's law: N=C/v

(C: light speed in air or vacuum; v: light speed in medium such as mantle)

During the refraction, there is a physical phenomenon called dispersion. That is different wave lengths have different refraction indices. Red light which has longer wavelength has less refraction indices; blue light which has shorter wavelength has larger refraction indices. According to the above formula, red light has smaller N and faster v. (lightspeed C is constant). Thus, it means that radiation with longer wavelength transmit faster in the medium such as earth mantle. We assume that the radiations from earth compose a wide spectrum of radiation wavelengths since the radiation substances inside earth is complicated and varied. Thus, radiations with longer wavelength will be released out from inner earth faster. That is why infrared or radio signal which have longer wavelengths are seen before the main phase of earthquakes. This situation is important for earthquake prediction. Because radiations with shorter wavelengths are associated with higher energy, the short wavelength radiations are more possible to cause earthquake detrimental effects. (E=hf). However, it radiations with longer wavelengths and smaller energy are emitted out faster, we can use them as warning signals. Besides, we might expect to see a radiation spectrum change during earthquake. It should be infrared signal first, then visible light such as earthquake light, and finally UV spectrum light. This serial change of radiation spectrum can also help us for earthquake prediction. A recent review study pointed out there is really EM frequency increase pattern before earthquakes.23

 

Based on the cause-effect relationship, we can examine the following criteria for the link of earthquake and EM radiation.24252627 First of all, we check the strength association. Stronger earthquakes are accompanied by strong EM radiation signals and more intense ionospheric anomalies. Second, we look at the consistency. All measured earthquakes can be detected the release of EM radiation. Third, we can see the temporality. Infrared light anomalies and earthquake light are detected before or during the onset of earthquakes. Fourth, we examine the plausibility. That earthquake caused by the release of electromagnetic radiation energy is more plausible than the current plate tectonic theory. There is no driving force for such an abrupt and vigorous movement in a single point for the current plate tectonic theory. Some say that tectonic plate movement is driven by mantle convection. However, how can this slowly and continuously creeping heat motion cause an abrupt and vigorous signal point disaster? Based on the Unruh-Hawking equation, heat radiation can be mutually transformed into acceleration. You may argue the heat radiation could be from the crust acceleration. However, the truth is the opposite. The heat radiation from the inside earth was transformed into crust acceleration during earthquakes. There is no plausible reason and driving force for the abrupt happened crust acceleration based on plate tectonic theory. If we look at the formula of F=ma, the net acceleration caused by earthquake will be very small with the large mass of the whole tectonic plate due to the plate tectonic theory. Thus, the heat radiation transformed by the tiny acceleration should be neglected due to the plate tectonic theory. Tectonic plates always move continuously and slowly, and we can find out the temporal association between the plate movement and the occurrence of earthquakes. In addition, there is a lack of strength association. We never observe, detect, or confirm that a more vigorous plate movement has a direct link to a more detrimental earthquake. Plate tectonics theory also has a defect in the consistency. In the detrimental and huge Sichuan earthquake, this earthquake didn't even happen in the boundary of plate-and-plate. How can plate tectonic movement cause such a huge earthquake?

 

In summary, we think this new earthquake theory is the actual mechanism of earthquake happening. Plate tectonics theory fails to help to do earthquake prediction. This new theory can shed a light for earthquake prediction. If we can monitor or detect radiation anomaly (earthquake light, radio disturbance, EMW anomaly, infrared light anomaly) before earthquake, we might be able to know when and where the earthquake will happen. Earthquake can be very huge and detrimental. Around 100 thousand people might be killed in current Sichuan earthquake. Current continental drift/plate tectonics theory is wrong, and this wrong theory prevents us from doing earthquake prediction. We sincerely hope this new theory can be helpful in earthquake prediction to avoid huge amount of human life loss.

 

References

  • 1. Martinez-Oliveros J.C. et al. Helioseismic analysis of the solar flare-induced sunquake of 2005 January 15 II. A magnetoseismic study. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 389,1905-1910 (2008)
  • 2. Hedervari P. Earthquake light phenomenon Nature 301,368 (1983)
  • 3. Lloyd J.J. Earthquake light Science 193,1070 (1976)
  • 4. Richter C.F. Earthquake light in focus Science 194,259 (1976)
  • 5. Kamogawa M. et al. Earthquake light: 1995 Kobe earthquake in Japan Atmospheric Research 76,438-444 (2005)
  • 6. Biagi P.F. et al. LF radio anomalies revealed in Italy by the wavelet analysis: possible preseismic effect during 1997-1998. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 31, 403-408 (2006)
  • 7. Biagi P.F. et al. Possible earthquake precursors revealed by LF radio signals Nature Hazards and Earth System Sciences 1,99-104 (2001)
  • 8. Liu J.Y. et al. Seismoionospheric GPS total electron content anomalies observed before the May 2008 Mw7.9 Wenchuan earthquake Journal of Geophysical Research 114,1-10 (2009)
  • 9. Ruzhin Y.Y. et al. Earthquake precursors in magnetically conjugated ionosphere regions Advance in Space Research 21,525-528 (1998)
  • 10. Liu J. Y. et al. Seismo-ionospheric signatures prior to M>6.0 Taiwan earthquakes Geophysical Research Letters 27,3113-3116 (2000)
  • 11. Fujiwara H. et al. Atmospheric anomalies observed during earthquake occurrences Geophysical Research Letters 31,L17110 (2004)
  • 12. Ni S.D. et al. Energy radiation from the Sumatra earthquake Nature 434,582 (2005)
  • 13. Uyeda S. et al. Electric and magnetic phenomena observed before the volcano-seismic activity in 2000 in the Izu island religion, Japan PNAS 99,7352-7355(2002)
  • 14. Uyeda S. et al. Geoelectric potential changes: possible precursors to earthquakes in Japan PNAS 97,4561-4566 (2000)
  • 15. Varotsos P.A. et al. Electric fields that arrive before the time derivative of the magnetic field prior to major earthquakes Physical Review Letters 91, 148501(2003)
  • 16. Ouzounov D. and Freund F. Mid-infrared emission prior to strong earthquakes analyzed by remote sensing data Advances in Space Research 33,268-273 (2004)
  • 17. Tronin A. A. et al. Thermal IR satellite data application for earthquake research in Japan and China Journal of Geodynamics 33,519-534 (2002)
  • 18. Fujinawa Y. et al. Emission of electromagnetic radiation preceding the Ito seismic swarm of 1989 Nature 347,376-378 (1990)
  • 19. Fujinawa Y. et al. Experiments to locate sources of earthquake-related VLF electromagnetic signals Proc. Jpn. Acad 73,33-38 (1997)
  • 20. Oike K. et al. Electromagnetic radiations from rocks J. Geophys. Res. 90,6245-6249 (1985)
  • 21. Varatos P. et al. Physical properties of the variations of the electric field of the earth preceding earthquake Tectonophysics 110,73-98 (1984)
  • 22. Ikeya M. et al. Electric shocks resulting in seismic animal anomalous behaviors J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 65,710-712 (1996)
  • 23. Chen ZY. Et al. The observation and research on pre-earthquake electromagnetic radiation information Acta Seismologica Sinica 6,485-494 (1993)
  • 24. Lin JW Principal component analysis method in the detection of total electron content anomalies in the 24hrs prior to large earthquakes Arab J Geosci online 2010 October
  • 25. Biagi RF Possible earthquake precursors revealed by LF radio signals Natural Hazards & Earth System Science 1,99-104 (2001)
  • 26. Fujinawa Y et al. Electromagnetic radiations associated with major earthquakes Physics of the Earth & Planetary Interiors 105, 249-259 (1998)
  • 27. Kamogawa M Preseismic lithosphere-atmosphere ionosphere coupling Eos 87,417-424 (2006)



Information about this Article
This Article has not yet been peer-reviewed
This Article was published on 17th September, 2011 at 06:53:35 and has been viewed 4286 times.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.
The full citation for this Article is:
Hu, W. (2011). Earthquake is abrupt release of radiation from crust fissure or hole. PHILICA.COM Article number 278.


<< Go back Review this ArticlePrinter-friendlyReport this Article



Website copyright © 2006-07 Philica; authors retain the rights to their work under this Creative Commons License and reviews are copyleft under the GNU free documentation license.
Using this site indicates acceptance of our Terms and Conditions.

This page was generated in 0.3086 seconds.